Real Bali Property Yields 2026 — the Facts

Analytics · BDA · Bali rental yields

Real Bali property yields: the facts, not developer marketing

In short The real net yield on Bali rental property is 6–14% a year in hand per management-company reports, not the 15–18% from developer ads. Weak apartments in over-hyped Canggu locations return 5.8–8.3%; well-chosen villas in Ubud and Bingin return 12–14%. What decides it isn't the developer's brand, but the entry price relative to the real rental income.
DTDmitrii Totoev, founder of BDA Updated June 15, 2026

If you want to understand how the Bali property market actually works right now — with no marketing promises — this breakdown is for you. We'll look at the actual yield of specific complexes according to management-company reports, show how far it diverges from what was claimed at the point of sale, and unpack which segments really deliver strong results today.

Villa with a pool amid tropical greenery on Bali, aerial view
Real properties from the sample — Bingin, Ubud, Canggu

The key question

Where on Bali it still makes sense to buy in, and where it's already overpriced

Short answer: it's not about the district in itself, but about the combination of segment, property characteristics and entry price. Right now the consistent performers are view and wellness villas in Ubud and villas in the proven rental locations of the south — Bingin: there, 12–14% in hand is confirmed by management-company reports. Overpriced are the over-hyped apartments in premium Canggu spots, where the rent comes out average for the area but the entry price is inflated for the address and the marketing.

Overpriced — steer clear

  • Over-hyped apartments in premium spots of Canggu and Berawa (near the beach clubs): the rent is average for the area, but the entry price is inflated for the address and the marketing.Sunny Aparts II — 5.8% · Alex Complex 5 — 8.3%
  • Short leasehold at a premium price: part of the "yield" is merely a return of your invested capital, not profit.

Where it makes sense to buy in

  • View and wellness villas in Ubud: the view and the concept command a premium on rent and steady demand.Green Flow — 13.9% · Magnitude — 13.6% · Happiness — 11.8%
  • Proven rental locations of the south — Bingin: a working format with steady demand, not showcase luxury.Young Villas — 12.1–12.0%
  • Properties with a reasonable entry price, even from a less-hyped developer.Alex Complex 3 — 12.5% on the same income as Complex 5

But even within the "right" segment, the entry price decides everything: the very same cash flow, when you overpay, turns 17% into 11% (see House of Wings below). "Where" is always segment × property characteristics × entry price, not a dot on the map.

Negative cases · overpaying

Loud advertising doesn't equal high yield

The most heavily advertised complexes are showing weak yields today — not because they rent poorly, but because the purchase price was inflated relative to what the property actually earns. On rent they come out at the average figures for their area — you can't beat the market — but marketing pushed up the sale price. Let's break down three properties in Canggu and Pererenan.

Berawa, Canggu · 1BR apartment · 30-year leasehold

Sunny Aparts II

5.8% actualpromised up to 18%

The developer publishes its own calculation: a net yield of 10.39% under the "conservative" scenario and 15.12% under the "realistic" one, and in another block — "up to 18% a year." In fact, per the management-company report, a one-bedroom apartment returns $10,500 a year at a price of $180,000 — that's 5.8% in hand. The claimed yield turned out to be almost three times the real one.

Sunny Aparts II: promised vs real
Net yield against the $180,000 price · management-company report
"Up to 18%" (ad)18%
Developer's "realistic" scenario15.1%
Actual, per the management-company report5.8%

The reason for the gap is that in the marketing calculation operating costs are set at 30% of income, whereas in reality (tax, operators, vacancy, management) they're closer to 55%. It's exactly this "optimization" in the presentation that turns the actual 5.8% into the promised 15–18%.

By Finns Beach Club, Canggu · 80 m² apartment · leasehold to 2048

Alex Complex 5

8.3%78% occupancy

A one-bedroom apartment of 80 m², priced at around $180,000, net income $15,000 a year — 8.3%. Occupancy is 78% and the complex is sold out. The income is normal for this area, but the entry price is high because of the hyped location by the beach club: here you overpay for the address, and the overpayment eats into the yield.

All of these apartments are leasehold (Sunny — 30 years with an extension option, Alex Complex 5 — to September 2048). On a short leasehold, a high yield is partly just returning your invested capital: by the end of the term the asset's value trends toward zero. The real picture is even more modest than the annual percentage suggests.

Pererenan · 1BR apartment · sold earlier and cheaper

Alex Complex 3 — same income, lower entry price

12.5%

Same developer as Complex 5 (Alex Villas Group), and the same income — $15,000 a year. But Complex 3 in Pererenan sold earlier and by a less-hyped developer, so the entry price stayed lower — $120,000. And here the yield genuinely materializes: 12.5% versus 8.3% at the neighboring complex. Both rent at the area's average — the difference was made by the entry price, not the property itself.

One developer, identical income — different yield
Alex Villas Group · $15,000/year income on both properties
Complex 3 · Pererenan
12.5%
Entry price$120,000
Income/year$15,000
VS
Complex 5 · Canggu
8.3%
Entry price$180,000
Income/year$15,000

Yield isn't killed by poor rent, but by overpaying for marketing and an address. The very same cash flow gives 8.3% or 12.5% — the entry price decides everything.

The "ad → fact" gap

What the owner of the most heavily advertised apartments actually gets

5.8%
Sunny Aparts II's actual yield in hand ($10.5k / $180k)
promised up to 18%
8.3%
Alex Complex 5 at 78% occupancy — an average result for the area
high entry price
~55%
real operating costs (marketing calculations assume ~30%)
the hidden difference

Positive cases · where the yield is real

Where the yield really is high

A high yield — 12–14% net — comes from properties with a real advantage: villas in proven rental locations (Ubud, Bingin) or with special characteristics — view and experience villas that a guest pays a premium for.

Net yield against purchase price — per management-company reports
Ubud and Bingin villas · income ÷ purchase price
Green Flow, Ubud · 1BR — $25k / $180k13.9%
Magnitude, Ubud · 2BR — $45k / $330k13.6%
Young Villas, Bingin · 2BR — $46k / $380k12.1%
Young Villas, Bingin · 3BR — $60k / $500k12.0%
Green Flow, Ubud · 2BR — $30k / $250k12.0%
Magnitude, Ubud · 1BR — $30k / $250k12.0%
Happiness, Ubud · 3BR — $45k / $380k (still under construction)11.8%

Ubud · view villas

Green Flow

1BR · 13.9%2BR · 12.0%

A complex in Ubud with views over the rice fields and jungle. It's precisely the view and the calm wellness location that sustain a high rental rate and steady year-round demand — so the 1BR ($180k → $25k/year) returns 13.9% and the 2BR ($250k → $30k/year) returns 12.0%. Here the yield is a consequence of the view and the format, not the developer's name.

Ubud · view "Instagram" villas

Magnitude

2BR · 13.6%1BR · 12.0%

View villas with a strong visual concept — the kind today's guest chooses for the experience, not just a place to sleep. A strong "picture" and panorama command a premium on the rental rate: 2BR ($330k → $45k/year) — 13.6%, 1BR ($250k → $30k/year) — 12.0%. Here it's the concept and the architecture that drive the yield.

Bingin · by the Bukit surf coast

Young Villas

2BR · 12.1%3BR · 12.0%

Bingin is a proven rental location in the south by the Bukit surf coast, with steady demand. This is a working format, not a showcase ultra-luxury property with low occupancy: 2BR ($380k → $46k/year) — 12.1%, 3BR ($500k → $60k/year) — 12.0%. The result rests on a location with steady year-round demand.

Ubud · 3BR · still under construction

Happiness

3BR · 11.8%under construction

The property is still under construction, so 11.8% ($380k → $45k/year) is the lower, conservative bound: on a completed and occupied property the figure usually rises. Even at the construction stage the model delivers a yield above the weak Canggu apartments — thanks to the Ubud wellness location and the 3BR format.

A high yield comes not from the developer's brand, but from the property's characteristics: location, view, concept and entry price.

A special case · experience villa

House of Wings: how the entry price splits one cash flow in two

An exclusive view property with signature architecture — an example of how uniqueness, not the district, defines the economics. A guest pays a premium for that "experience," and the villa brings in $122,000 of rent a year.

The property cost $700–800k to build and brings in $122,000 a year: for its creator that's 15.3–17.4% on invested capital. It's now being resold for $1,100,000 — and for the new buyer the same rent already gives just 11.1%.

The cash flow is one and the same — yet the yield differs: everything is decided by the price at which you enter the property. It's the same logic as in the negative cases, only with the opposite sign: uniqueness drives high rent, but overpaying on entry still cuts the yield.

The same $122k/year income — two outcomes
Creator
15.3–17.4%
Invested$700–800k
Income/year$122,000
VS
New buyer
11.1%
Price$1,100,000
Income/year$122,000

How to choose a property

Analyze the property, not the developer

Yield is determined by the property's characteristics and the entry price, not by the developer's name. The same developer can be selling a strong and a weak property at the same time — as with Alex Complex 3 and Complex 5 above. So when choosing, you look not at reputation, but at three things.

Factor 1

Real yield, not the claimed one

The figures of comparable operating properties of the same class — from management-company reports, not from a presentation.

Factor 2

Market averages

Occupancy and ADR for this type and location — to gauge whether the claimed income is realistic.

Factor 3

Ownership structure

Freehold or leasehold and for how long — this directly affects the "true" yield.

The developer's name is a weak predictor of yield. The strong predictor is the specific property's characteristics, checked against the market averages.

What's on sale now

What not to fall for in the marketing right now

Today there are once again plenty of developers with sky-high promises. Beyond the inflated yield (as in the cases above), two tricks are especially loud right now — both convincing in words, but not backed by real numbers.

Trick 1
"We're building next to the Kempinski"

It goes like this: "next to the Kempinski (or another five-star hotel) in Nusa Dua, and brands like that don't pick a bad location." Nice logic, but it has nothing to do with the yield of the specific property. By our analytics, it's almost impossible for apartments to compete with five-star hotels — all the more so since such projects usually aren't on the beachfront and have nowhere near comparable infrastructure, let alone the brand. Being next to a luxury hotel is a line in a presentation, not a confirmed rental rate.

Trick 2
"Managed by Accor / Wyndham"

It goes like this: "an international hotel brand has been brought in to manage it." In reality it's most often just a franchise: it raises the management costs, but the complex itself keeps operating at the market-average apartment prices. As a rule, the brand adds nothing to the rental rate — the same picture holds across other Asian markets too. In essence, you pay for the signage, and the yield stays average.

In both cases the check is the same: look not at the signage and not at the neighbor, but at the real numbers for comparable operating properties. If you need a shortlist like that for your budget — we'll send one based on actual figures from reports, not on marketing.

The bottom line

The bottom line: where to buy in, and where to steer clear

On Bali there are plenty of segments where you can earn a real yield of 12–15% in hand — you can see it in the properties above: view and wellness villas in Ubud, proven rental locations of the south like Bingin, and select experience villas. It's not about one "magic" district, but about picking a property with confirmed rent and a reasonable entry price.

The main rule is simple: don't listen to marketing claims and unsubstantiated developer promises — neither the sky-high percentages from a presentation, nor the proximity to a luxury hotel, nor the management by a famous brand — but look at the real analytics for confirmed properties. The same income gives 8.3% or 12.5% depending on the entry price; the same property gives 17% to its creator and 11% to a buyer at an inflated price. Three things decide it: the real yield of comparable properties, the segment-average occupancy and ADR, and the ownership structure.

The Bali market has stopped forgiving overpayment — but for someone who selects properties by the actual figures, there are even more opportunities. We keep data on 30,000+ properties for exactly this. If you'd like, we'll send a shortlist based on the real numbers for your budget and horizon.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Short answers to the questions we're asked most — with figures from the property reports.

What is the real yield on Bali property?
Per management-company reports — roughly 6–14% a year net in hand, depending on the property. Weak apartments in over-hyped locations return around 6–8%, well-chosen villas in Ubud and Bingin return 12–14%.
Why do developers promise 15–18% but you get less?
Because in marketing calculations operating costs are understated (often down to ~30% of income instead of the real ~55%) and occupancy is set optimistically. On a real property in Berawa, the claimed 10–15% turned into an actual 5.8%.
What's better for income — an apartment or a villa on Bali?
In this sample, villas in Ubud and Bingin (12–14%) beat apartments in Canggu (6–8%). But it's not about the property type — it's about the entry price relative to the real rental income.
Does leasehold affect property yield on Bali?
Yes. On leasehold the yield should be higher, because by the end of the term (for example, 2048) the asset's value trends toward zero, and part of the annual income is a return of your capital, not profit.
Can you trust the yield figures on a developer's site?
They need to be checked. The most reliable way is to cross-check against reports on already-operating properties of the same class and location, rather than relying on a forecast in a presentation.
DT
Dmitrii Totoev

Founder of BDA (Bali Developers Accelerator). In real estate since 2012, with $350M+ in deals across four markets (Russia, Dubai, Turkey, Bali) and $50M+ on Bali. The yields in this article are taken from reports on specific properties, not from marketing materials. The calculations rely on a proprietary base of 30,000+ Bali properties (sources: AirDNA, management companies, direct owner reports). The methodology does not inflate yield or understate risk.

Methodological note: percentages are given as net yield against the purchase price over the actual holding period; prices are per developer and agency sites.
Last updated: June 15, 2026

We'll find you properties with real yield

BDA analyzes the market using its proprietary base of 30,000+ properties and sends a shortlist based on actual figures from reports, not on developer marketing.

Get in touch with BDA